Structural consultants
Engineers who need tensile strength, stiffness and bond stated separately before they redesign a member.
Comparison page · GFRP and TMT
An educational comparison for engineers, procurement teams and project heads. It sets out what is different about the bar, what changes in the design, and which cost lines to compare. It does not offer one saving figure for every project.
Published by 7 Star IMPEX LLP · 18 October 2026 · Property figures are from 7 STAR’s published product literature and the test reports printed in it.
Most GFRP questions start with “is it cheaper than TMT?” The honest answer depends on the element, so this page is written for the people who will check the numbers.
Engineers who need tensile strength, stiffness and bond stated separately before they redesign a member.
Buyers comparing a per-kg steel rate with a per-metre GFRP rate and needing the lines that sit between them.
Decision-makers weighing first cost against corrosion, maintenance and programme.
Site teams who will carry, cut, tie and place the bar, and who carry the risk of scrap and theft.
Steel values are for Fe 500 grade, as 7 STAR’s literature presents them. The GFRP strength and modulus figures are the averages from the tensile test reports printed in the same literature (tests carried out for Armastek, 7 STAR’s technology partner).
| Property | TMT steel (Fe 500) | GFRP rebar | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength | 500 MPa minimum | About 1,050–1,240 MPa (test averages, 6–20 mm) | More tensile capacity per square millimetre. |
| Modulus of elasticity | About 200 GPa | About 45–53 GPa (test averages) | Roughly a quarter as stiff. Deflection and crack width often govern the design. |
| Elongation | 12% minimum, with a yield plateau | About 2–3% at failure, no yield | Linear-elastic to rupture. No ductile warning, so safety factors differ. |
| Weight, 8 mm bar | 0.395 kg/m | 0.079 kg/m | About one fifth of the weight at the same diameter. |
| Density | 7.8 t/m³ | 1.9 t/m³ | Freight and handling change most. |
| Supply length | 12 m bars | Coils up to 100 m in small diameters; 12 m bars above 12 mm | Fewer laps on long runs. |
| Corrosion | Rusts if cover or exposure fail | Does not rust | The main reason to specify GFRP in wet, saline and chemical exposure. |
| Electrical and magnetic | Conductive and magnetic | Non-conductive and non-magnetic | Useful near induction loops, sensitive equipment and electrical rooms. |
| Transverse shear | 120 MPa | 170 MPa | Literature figure. Shear design still follows the GFRP design guide. |
| Bond strength | 14 MPa | 12.5 MPa | Slightly lower. Development and lap lengths are calculated for GFRP. |
| Compression | 500 MPa | 450 MPa | Design guides such as ACI 440.1R do not rely on GFRP bars in compression. |
| Concrete cover | 35–45 mm | 20 mm (literature figure) | Cover follows the project code and fire rating, not the brochure. |
A GFRP schedule is a new design, not a find-and-replace on bar marks. These are the points a consultant will check first.
With twice the tensile strength and a quarter of the stiffness, many slabs are sized for deflection and crack width, not strength. Bar area may fall, stay the same or rise.
GFRP members are designed to FRP guides such as ACI 440.1R. Road components follow the references IRC:137-2022 sets out. A steel code is not applied to a GFRP bar.
GFRP cannot be bent on site. Stirrups and shaped bars are ordered against a drawing, so the bending schedule has to be ready earlier.
Bond differs from steel, so lap and anchorage lengths are recalculated. Long coils can remove many laps on slabs, drains and pavements.
GFRP softens at high temperature. 7 STAR’s FAQ notes concrete cover protects the bar and fire-tested slabs stay structurally safe. Fire-rated members need the consultant’s check.
Many projects use GFRP in slabs, pavements and drains while columns and primary frames stay in steel. 7 STAR’s FAQ describes exactly that split for seismic zones.
Per kilogram, GFRP looks more expensive. Per metre and per finished element, the picture changes. These are the lines a fair BOQ comparison includes. Leave any of them out and the answer is wrong in one direction or the other.
| Cost line | What changes with GFRP | What to check |
|---|---|---|
| Bar rate | Higher per kg, far lower weight per metre | Compare rate per metre and per element, never per kg alone. |
| Bar quantity | Set by the GFRP redesign | Use the consultant’s GFRP schedule, not a converted steel schedule. |
| Laps and overlap | Long coils remove many laps | Count the laps actually saved on the drawing. |
| Freight and lifting | About one fifth of the weight | Truck loads, crane time and manual handling on site. |
| Labour and placing | Lighter bars and ready mesh place faster | Crew size and days on your programme, not a brochure rate. |
| Scrap and reconciliation | Cut-to-length supply; offcuts have no scrap resale market | Your current steel wastage and reconciliation losses. |
| Corrosion protection | No coatings or corrosion-inhibiting admixtures for the bar | What the steel design specifies for exposure today. |
| Maintenance and life | No rust-driven repairs | Repair history of similar steel elements on your sites. |
| Price movement | Steel rates move with raw material and market prices | Agree a rate validity period for whichever material you buy. |
Savings depend on the element, the exposure, the steel price on the day and how many of the lines above apply. 7 STAR prepares project-wise BOQ comparisons on request. That is the number worth using.
An honest comparison includes the cases where steel is still the right bar.
Slabs on grade, industrial and warehouse floors, pavements, drains, boundary walls, retaining walls, water tanks, STPs and precast items, especially in wet, saline or chemical exposure.
GFRP mesh for floors, roads and drainage, BIS and IRC standards, and precast and bent elements.
In tension, yes. The tensile test averages printed in 7 STAR’s literature are about 1,050 to 1,240 MPa, against a 500 MPa minimum for Fe 500 steel. GFRP is also about a quarter as stiff and does not yield, so a stronger bar does not automatically mean a smaller one.
Per kilogram, no. Per metre and per finished element, it often is, once weight, laps, freight, labour, scrap and corrosion protection are counted. The answer is project-specific, so ask for a BOQ comparison on a real element.
Not by substitution. The GFRP schedule has to be designed for its lower stiffness and different bond. Diameter and spacing may change in either direction.
No. Columns and heavy compression members stay in steel. GFRP is used where reinforcement works in tension, such as slabs, pavements, walls and drains.
7 STAR’s literature gives a service life of 80 to 100 years or more, because the bar does not rust. Actual life also depends on concrete quality, cover and loading.
Yes. A common pattern is GFRP in slabs, floors and drains, with steel kept in columns and primary frames. 7 STAR’s FAQ says the two can be tied together with normal binding wire on building work. Road works follow IRC:137-2022 tying rules.
Send one real element, such as a slab, a drain section or a wall panel. The comparison lists every assumption. You can also call +91-7669275932 or write to contact@7stargfrp.com.
Application pages: Flooring · Roads & Drains · Standards · Precast & Bent. Or read the 7 STAR GFRP blog.